Thread started: Jun 24 2008, 5:06 PM EDT
Watch
I think breaking it down into sub-elements would work well. It would be nice to have definitions and examples of just what the different park types are...what makes up the type of park, elements in that park, etc. For example, there are different elements that define a regional park versus a community park or a pocket park and a different set of users for each. It could be helpful for those unfamiliar with the different types of parks as well or for someone trying to refer clients or other consultants towards examples.
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
Show Last Reply
|
|
Last Reply:
RE: Park Sub-Elements
By: ,
Jul 3 2008, 4:54 PM EDT
Exactly.
Another thing I think is really important when it comes to defining parks is the type, in terms of public, private or semi-private. I think breaking out at least the basic parks will help understand not only the users but the items that might make up that park. That way also it saves people from having to list out every little thing within the boundaries of the park. Typically if you say "sports park" you might have an idea of a thing or two said park would contain but might only need to specifically mention the playground because it, for example, includes some unique feature that differs from the standard playground setup.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
